If you are not sure about designing
your own teaching materials, kwowing the advantages and disadvantages
of it might help you to make up your mind.
Why is it that teachers all over the
world choose to construct their own teaching materials despite the
wide variety of commercially produced ones? Jocelyn Howard
and Jae Major
talk about it in their work “Guidelines for Designing Effective English Language Teaching Materials”.
They emphasize the fact that there are some advantages and
disadvantages when it comes to material designing that should be
taken into account by teachers.
Advantages
According to Howard and Major, one of
the main reasons why teachers may consider to produce teaching
materials is “contextualisation”.
When reading a coursebook it is quite clear for teachers that there
are certain activities or topics that just don't “fit” with the
real context of a particular group of students. This happens because most of the commercial teaching products are designed for the world-wide EFL
market. For instance, if you are teaching in an impoverished context
your students may find it useless or even discouraging to learn
vocabulary about “holidays”. So, by producing their own
materials, teachers can take into account all the particularities of
a specific group of students (their contexts, cultural backgrounds,
previous knowledge, available resources, etc.) Another advantage of
designing teaching materials is that allows teachers to consider
“individual needs”. As
a teacher, you should acknowledge the differences among students
within the same group and adapting or creating teaching materials
considering the learners' first languages and cultures, their
learning needs and their previous experience. “Personalisation”
is another advantage of teacher-designed materials.
When teachers
make their own material, they are adding a personal touch that
students usually appreciate. Finally, “timeline”
is another characteristic that encourages teachers to start producing
their own materials, as allow them to respond to local and
international events with up-to-date, relevant
and high interest
topics and tasks.
Now
we will focus on the disadvantages of materials designed by teachers that Howard and Major mention as the most relevant ones. The
first one is “organization”.
Teachers that design their own teaching materials sometimes find it
difficult to make a clear progression on their lessons. This could cause frustration in the learners who will not be able to see the
development of their English. That's why coursebooks, which are
usually well-organised and follow certain principles and patterns,
offer both: teachers and learnes security and a sense of
“knowing what they are doing and what follows”. The second, and
according to the writers the most common criticism against
teacher-made materials, is “quality”.
Teachers who lack of experience and understanding may produce
materials which contain errors, poorly constructed and that lack of
durability. The third disadvantage emphasized is “time”.
For many teachers it is not possible to find the time to actually
make their own materials, even if they believe that is the best
option. This reason may
inhibit teachers from producing their own teaching materials.
As we have seen,
there are many factors to take into account when thinking about
whether or not to design our own teaching material. The authors give
some advice to make this in the best possible way, such as adapt
and modify materials to supplement a coursebook rather than starting
from scratch. Of course that teachers will become better material designers only with a lot of practice and experience in the matter. The only way is trying, so be as creative as you can and you will succeed.
To find more
information about how to be a good teaching material designer go
ahead and take a look to the complete text by Howard and Major where
you will find a guidelines for designing efective English Teaching
Materials
and factors to consider when designing materials
.
Hi girls!! We have read (and really enjoyed) your entry on this topic. It has an appealing title and picture, and gives a really clear idea of the “two sides of the moon” when deciding to design materials. Furthermore, the hyperlink on the authors’ names offers the readers the opportunity of knowing something more about them, and thus take their article more seriously. The only thing that we perceive as “strange” is that you provide the link to the article at the very beginning of the entry and then again at the very end. Perhaps you thought about it as a reminder, in which case it’s a very good strategy. Go ahead writing and sharing such relevant information! See you!
ResponderEliminarHi Nerea and Priscila! Thanks for sharing your opinion about this entry with us. When we were writing this post we thought it would be a good idea to provide the text link twice, one at the very beginning for those anxious readers who want to know about it immediately, and then at the end for those readers who might want to inform themselves in depth about the topic. It shows that you read our post thoroughly, girls! We appreciate that.
ResponderEliminar